💰 PokerStars Extends Software Restrictions to Ban All Seating Scripts

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🔥

Filter:
Sort:
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

For each of these, changing Block All to Permit All (or to the least restrictive permissions) should be sufficient to permit you to access the site. The instructions​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Some of the latter set of tools, like bots, have been banned for as long as Macros and Hotkey programs for gameplay efficiency that do not.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars Banned Software Any program that shares hole card data with other players or programs is colluding, and is prohibited. Any program that works off of​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

According to a report by Poker Industry Pro, PokerStars has banned all seating scripts that aid players in finding tables in any way, a move.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

in the works for a long time. PokerStars has been one of the primary sites to tackle seating scripts at its tables, and it has now banned all of.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

For each of these, changing Block All to Permit All (or to the least restrictive permissions) should be sufficient to permit you to access the site. The instructions​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars Banned Software Any program that shares hole card data with other players or programs is colluding, and is prohibited. Any program that works off of​.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

promo.sushihouse75.ru › news › pokerstars-extends-software-restriction.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Some of the latter set of tools, like bots, have been banned for as long as Macros and Hotkey programs for gameplay efficiency that do not.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

🔥

Software - MORE
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Some of the latter set of tools, like bots, have been banned for as long as Macros and Hotkey programs for gameplay efficiency that do not.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars ban software

Nikolay Nakhaev. Banning poker HUDs is equivalent to saying we should ban data in all sports. Then he can promote "look no big winners, this is fair for everyone". After all poker is an information game, so taking nearly all information out of the game is sort of making it dumber. I loved HUDs well before I ever sold them because they are amazing tools to learn and get better at a game I assume we all love if we're playing it. Forgot Password? It's kind of a double edged sword removing huds, it also removes the amount of information you can play with and the level of analysis you want to give the game but they come most in to use for people playing lots of tables at once. September 3rd, , PM. They will probably keep it,in my opinion ,as most players are using a hud atm. I am against the use of hud I think it should really be blocked. People playing more than 4 tables are generally winners, so when they are forced to play less, there will be less sharks at the table. For me personally I am not going to play poker, if its not allowed to be a long term winning player, or if games are made essentially unbeatable. Yong didn't just ban Huds he banned tracking software like PT4 and all the others. And therefore I am not really on board with the way, Rob Yong think about this. Join Date: Jan I dont use hud. From the perspective of a casino owner that sort of make sense, because if nobody is winning long term, then all the money end up as rake. No more stats in baseball! Have never used a HUD myself. Where is the money in online poker? Join Date: Mar They will look at it see how it is going elsewhere and then make their decision. And I cant help thinking, that this also say a lot about the changes on PartyPoker. I dont think, PartyPokers solution is wrong though. My 2 cents. I like to play with a HUD, and I rarely play much more than 4 tables, so for me the solution, PokerStars has chosen, is nearly ideal and might actually see me return to the site as my main place to play cash games. September 3rd, , AM. The way Party has gone about this was by removing hand histories rather than just banning them which makes them more susceptible to fraud and collusion. There are pros and cons. I mean, why should we allow people to collect all of this data, and shift their players, and pitch to the locations where the hitters have the least success? September 5th, , PM. September 4th, , PM. It is very ugly!!! In the number of hands and tournaments played. One possible answer is to try and change the "shark to fish" ratio, so that each table on average is containing more fish and less sharks. It's not an issue of getting and finding players that has poker sites scrambling to try and figure out the best scenario for players and their bottom line. The consensus seem to be, that if new players lose their money to fast, they are unlikely to continue playing, so the question should be, how can poker sites make new players lose their money more slowly? Even if it's possible to cheat e. Eliminating the HUD would provide an additional chance for recreational players and could bring a fresh air to the poker pools where regs take a big advantage by using helpful tools to increase their winnings. September 9th, , PM. Join Date: May Join Date: Dec I don't think so, PS is much more bigger than party and if they'll ban hud many players will not like it i don't like hud because i haven't it, but in future i wanna buy it, very useful thing. For now however the result does seem to be, that traffic at PokerStars is slightly down, but the cash games have become noteciably softer and looser, as was the intention. Join Date: Apr The main issue is that the games are getting more difficult. I cannot see Pokerstars doing this. August 28th, , PM. Removing huds may mean people play less tables so the sites have less player volume and less bonuses and guarantee's. Join Date: Jul PokerStars recently changed the max numbers of tables you can simultaneously play on cash games from 24 to 4 only , and the reason for that was to keep the game's ecosystem sustainable for all players, so players that play just for fun, can still find it enjoyable Party Poker for the very same reasons banned the use of HUDs, do you think PS will do that to? Originally Posted by fundiver It had to be banned using hud!!!!! Remember Me? Personal preferences surely play a role here. My take on this issue is, that poker sites, professional, and semiprofessional players have a common interest in securing, that recreational players come into the game and then continue playing, because this is the only way, anyone can make a profit. And Rob Yong is entering pots with hands like 73s and generally playing in a way, that online would earn him a "fish" mark from every single regular very quickly. Originally Posted by John A. That program has helped my game a lot but I think Yong doesn't want players to improve just to shoot money back and forth across the table. Join Date: Sep If all the other rooms ban the huds, there is no way Pokerstars don't do it. I feel, this put the integrety of online poker in jeopardy, and it also take away the option of players to work on their game away from the tables. Sure this might also "level the playing field", but I think, this is taking it to far. August 29th, , AM. As for what further steps poker sites might take, including PokerStars, I think, they are going to take some time to evaluate the effect of the table cap, because they look to implement further big changes. John A. Meanwhile rake goes through the roof and nobody wins except PartyP. Ban HUDs, it is only fair that your do the research on a certain player and have notes taking down about how you feel they play, not having a machine or software program doing this is only fair. This makes "bum hunting" much more difficult and force sharks to spend more time playing against each other. The main proponent of the changes on PartyPoker has been Rob Yong, who is a casino owner and also high stakes live poker player. I think, its fairly subjective, which solution is best. August 29th, , PM. Join Date: Jun This would level the playing field and give advantage to those that can best interpret the data. Join Date: Oct If they do I consider playing cash games there again. The other option is to try and take edges away from the sharks. The only part, I am highly critical about, is getting rid of hand histories. So it's a lot more profitable have a massive number of recreative players, even they play micro stakes, then some professionals playing all day with softwares. It's just really bad reasoning. I hope they ban them. If the ban of the HUD makes them earn more money, then they'll certainly will. Maybe some will also react by moving up, which will further soften the games. If Pokerstars gets a sharks paradise image, the new players will choose another room. The main thing is if enough sites ban HUDs, they are just going to go into black markets and be much less accessible and much more expensive, and provide even bigger edges that current sellers don't provide because it would be unfair to do so. That's my main hope, because I love online poker, and it's never going to be live poker no matter what you try and do.

Up your game with free cardschat membership. HUDs are data, that's it. I'm sure that professional players would not be happy with such a decision but for new players and for the ecosystem I think it would be an inspired solution.

I also think, its pretty pokerstars ban software, that online poker has been in a slow decline for 10 years, and especially the traditional cash game tables are in danger of dyeing a slow shark filled death.

I like what HUDs pokerstars ban software but it is not fair to play against a person using a HUD, they should have notes of there own on you, not let a machine tell you the exact statistics.

How do you feel about not allowing players to use HUD? Maybe Rob Yong feel, that poker should be all about gambling and having fun, and that it is wrong to even try to develop a long term winning strategy. In the last few years, poker has actually been back on an incline world wide though. I just hope we don't try and turn online poker into live poker. But as poker players we need to ask ourselfes, if this is also our ideal for the game? HUDs don't have one single thing at all to do with the poker ecosystem. This is basically, what PokerStars is trying to do with the table cap. This is, what PartyPoker has done not only by banning HUDs but also by killing the traditional poker lobby, so players can no longer chose, which table to enter, or which seat.